Messages in this thread | | | From | Wayne.Brown@altec ... | Date | Sat, 18 May 2002 00:09:19 -0500 | Subject | Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 |
| |
Gee, what a tolerant attitude. I state my preference -- not a demand, just a preference -- that the old interfaces be retained IN ADDITION to whatever new features are added, and you say "Bah go away." I'm sorry, I must have missed the rule that says only people who agree with you are allowed to post their opinions on lkml.
The current system works just fine for my needs. I've never seen the point of trying to "improve" things that are already good enough. But now that you've explained it to me so politely, I understand. My top priority is supposed to be what YOU want, even though you don't care anything at all about what I want.
So, in the spirit of your oh-so-helpful message, let me say this: Get stuffed, jerk.
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> on 05/17/2002 06:14:45 PM
To: Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec@Altec cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3
So we should curb progress in the name of you not spending 2 minutes rewriting your bash scripts or repopulating your bash history with new commands?
Bah go away. I and most other people here are the exact opposite - give us new features, less bugs, or innovation and we will surely change. Otherwise we would still be in the stone age.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |