Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: implementing soft-updates | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 10 Apr 2002 21:24:20 +0200 |
| |
Dominik Kubla <kubla@sciobyte.de> writes:
> The background fsck capability, just like journalling or logging, are > typically only in needed in 24/7 systems (sure, they are nice to have in > your home system, but do you _REALLY_ need them? i don't!) and those > system typically are run on proven hardware which is operated well > within the specs. So please don't construct these kinds of arguments.
You can already do background fsck on a linux system today. Just do it on a LVM/EVMS snapshot.
-Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |