Messages in this thread | | | Subject | [BENCHMARK] short summary of LM bench performance of mm2 patch | Date | Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:29:11 +0530 | From | "Aniruddha M Marathe" <> |
| |
Hi, Josh, please comment on the format. Here is a short summary of performance of 2.5.51 mm2 as compared to 2.5.51 mm1 on LM bench. Figures below are 'median' of 5 results.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For detailed results, please mail me so that I will send results individually. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.5.51 mm1 2.5.51-mm2 ================================================================================== Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
1. Null call time decreased a bit. 0.46 0.44 2. increase in time for fork proc 362 403 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
1. 2p/16K ctxsw 5.01 4.84 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better 1. UDP 33 35 2. TCP 122 125 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better 1. 10K file delete 57 59 2. mmap latency 615 651 ==================================================================================
Rest of the results are not much different.
Regards, Aniruddha Marathe WIPRO technologies, India Aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com +91-80-5502001 extn 5092 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |