lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly
Date
On 12 November 2002 22:10, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
> (sorry to answer to not-final-version mail, but didn't keep the last
> one. This also applies, anyway...)
>
> On 2002.11.03 Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On 3 November 2002 14:17, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > > It seems gcc started to de-inline large functions.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff -urN linux-2.5.45.orig/include/linux/compiler.h
> > linux-2.5.45fix/include/linux/compiler.h ---
> > linux-2.5.45.orig/include/linux/compiler.h Wed Oct 30 22:43:05 2002
> > +++ linux-2.5.45fix/include/linux/compiler.h Sun Nov 3 15:19:20
> > 2002 @@ -20,3 +20,11 @@
> > __asm__ ("" : "=g"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
> > (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
> > #endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
> > +
> > +/* GCC 3 (and probably earlier, I'm not sure) can be told to
> > always inline + a function. */
> > +#if __GNUC__ < 3
> > +#define force_inline inline
> > +#else
> > +#define force_inline inline __attribute__ ((always_inline))
> > +#endif
>
> This should go before the #endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */, isn't it ?

Oh... You are right...
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.088 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site