Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 04 Nov 2002 13:41:07 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 01:21, Robert Love wrote: > I agree 100% we mark too much as inline - but at the same time, some > larger functions are inline simply because they were originally part of > another function and pulled out for cleanliness. They are only used > once... in other words, in some cases I hope the kernel developers know > what they are doing when they mark stuff inline.
gcc actually appears to know about that case for static functions.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |