Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <> | Subject | [PATCH] Cleanup of current->state for __set_current_state in linu x/fs/*.c | Date | Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:15:37 -0700 |
| |
Hi All
This is a simple patch to remove all direct usage of current->state in fs/*.c and use the helper __set_current_state().
Applies vs 2.5.43
Maybe it'd be better to use set_current_state() so it is truly SMP safe. I was wondering, but I did not want to change it without someone confirming a good reason.
Cheers,
diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/dquot.c linux-2.5.43/fs/dquot.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/dquot.c Tue Oct 15 20:28:29 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/dquot.c Wed Oct 16 22:11:22 2002 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ goto repeat; } remove_wait_queue(&dquot->dq_wait_lock, &wait); - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); } static inline void wait_on_dquot(struct dquot *dquot) @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ goto repeat; } remove_wait_queue(&dquot->dq_wait_free, &wait); - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); } /* Wait for all duplicated dquot references to be dropped */ @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ goto repeat; } remove_wait_queue(&dquot->dq_wait_free, &wait); - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); } static int read_dqblk(struct dquot *dquot) diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/exec.c linux-2.5.43/fs/exec.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/exec.c Tue Oct 15 20:27:53 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/exec.c Wed Oct 16 22:12:47 2002 @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ count = 1; while (atomic_read(&oldsig->count) > count) { oldsig->group_exit_task = current; - current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; + __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); spin_unlock_irq(&oldsig->siglock); schedule(); spin_lock_irq(&oldsig->siglock); diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/inode.c linux-2.5.43/fs/inode.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/inode.c Tue Oct 15 20:29:06 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/inode.c Wed Oct 16 22:13:21 2002 @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ goto repeat; } remove_wait_queue(wq, &wait); - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); } void wake_up_inode(struct inode *inode) diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/locks.c linux-2.5.43/fs/locks.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/locks.c Tue Oct 15 20:29:04 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/locks.c Wed Oct 16 22:06:41 2002 @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ int result = 0; DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; + __set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); add_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait); if (timeout == 0) schedule(); @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ if (signal_pending(current)) result = -ERESTARTSYS; remove_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait); - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING); return result; } diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/namei.c linux-2.5.43/fs/namei.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/namei.c Tue Oct 15 20:27:51 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/namei.c Wed Oct 16 22:10:39 2002 @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ if (current->total_link_count >= 40) goto loop; if (need_resched()) { - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); schedule(); } err = security_ops->inode_follow_link(dentry, nd); diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/pipe.c linux-2.5.43/fs/pipe.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/pipe.c Tue Oct 15 20:28:23 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/pipe.c Wed Oct 16 22:10:34 2002 @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ void pipe_wait(struct inode * inode) { DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; + __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); add_wait_queue(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait); up(PIPE_SEM(*inode)); schedule(); remove_wait_queue(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait); - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); down(PIPE_SEM(*inode)); } diff -urN linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/select.c linux-2.5.43/fs/select.c --- linux-2.5.43.orig/fs/select.c Tue Oct 15 20:27:09 2002 +++ linux-2.5.43/fs/select.c Wed Oct 16 21:58:32 2002 @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ } __timeout = schedule_timeout(__timeout); } - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING); poll_freewait(&table); @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ break; timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout); } - current->state = TASK_RUNNING; + __set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING); return count; } Inaky Perez-Gonzalez -- Not speaking for Intel - opinions are my own [or my fault]
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |