Messages in this thread | | | From | "Balbir Singh" <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] Suspected bug in getpeername and getsockname | Date | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:35:59 -0800 |
| |
>From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> > > Even if we do not pass the value passed by the user > to the protocol specific code, I would like to cleanup > the code in socket.c to check for invalid values > upfront and save time and space in all the calls. > >Optimizing error cases never bears any fruit.
In this case, I certainly think it does. Could u give a case as to why doing this would be harmful? I think the only issue can be maintainability and doing the change cleanly. But I think u are a good maintainer and will accept the changes only if they are properly fixed. Right :-)
Balbir
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |