Messages in this thread | | | From | "Balbir Singh" <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] Suspected bug in getpeername and getsockname | Date | Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:05:17 -0800 |
| |
>Can the user eat up more than a scheduling quantum because of the >work done by ->getname()? I certainly don't think you can prove >this. >
That depends on what ->getname() does. Anyway in my opinion any code which does all the processing and then catches any error is BROKEN.
>It certainly isn't work the long discussion we're having about it, >that is for sure. >
I agree! no point
>You want this to make your broken getname() protocol semantics work >and I'd like you to address that instead. I get the feeling that >you've designed this weird behavior and that it is not specified in >any standard anyways that your protocol must behave in this way. I >suggest you change it to work without the user length being >available. >
There is no other choice but to live with it.
Regards, Balbir
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |