lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [BUG] Suspected bug in getpeername and getsockname
Date
>Can the user eat up more than a scheduling quantum because of the
>work done by ->getname()? I certainly don't think you can prove
>this.
>

That depends on what ->getname() does. Anyway
in my opinion any code which does all the processing
and then catches any error is BROKEN.

>It certainly isn't work the long discussion we're having about it,
>that is for sure.
>

I agree! no point

>You want this to make your broken getname() protocol semantics work
>and I'd like you to address that instead. I get the feeling that
>you've designed this weird behavior and that it is not specified in
>any standard anyways that your protocol must behave in this way. I
>suggest you change it to work without the user length being
>available.
>

There is no other choice but to live with it.

Regards,
Balbir

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.052 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site