lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: low latency versus sched O(1) - and versus preempt
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:01:34AM +0100, Martin Mačok wrote:
> If I get enough free time, I will test O1+preempt versus O1+mini-ll.

O1+mini-ll feels better and smoother when playing tuxracer during
kernel compilation (both nice +19 and +0 cases). (but I haven't tested
O1+preempt+lockbreak)

However, comparing full_ll versus O(1)+mini_ll when there's no
load, I get 10% higher framerate of XMMS/Jess audio/visual plugin.
When there is some real load, O(1)+mini_ll performs ~30% higher
framerate then just full_ll.

(So the winner for my desktop is still vanilla+full_ll+largenice while
explicitely running non-interactive highload tasks with nice +19 (ie,
compilations, cronjobs, mailserver...) the only "audio skipping" task
is mkisofs)

--
Martin Mačok http://underground.cz/
martin.macok@underground.cz http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.122 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site