Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:12:06 +0100 | From | Martin Mačok <> | Subject | Re: low latency versus sched O(1) - and versus preempt |
| |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:06:44AM +0100, Martin Mačok wrote: > However, comparing full_ll versus O(1)+mini_ll when there's no > load, I get 10% higher framerate of XMMS/Jess audio/visual plugin.
(forgot to finish the sentence...) higher framerate with full_ll.
but:
> When there is some real load, O(1)+mini_ll performs ~30% higher > framerate then just full_ll.
-- Martin Mačok http://underground.cz/ martin.macok@underground.cz http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |