Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Jul 2000 15:47:41 +0100 (BST) | From | Tigran Aivazian <> | Subject | Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules |
| |
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, [ISO-8859-1] Gérard Roudier wrote: > I didn't know that the irq_restore() for a given irq_save() must also be > performed in the context of the same function. Thanks for the information. > Is it related to the flags containing informations about function's local > resources ? (registers used, ...)
it is documented in one of Rusty's Unreliable Guides - Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl
grep for something indecent and thou shalt find :)
Regards, Tigran
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |