Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:39:21 -0700 | From | David Ford <> | Subject | Re: The big IDE fight in a different light |
| |
Mike Castle wrote:
> If Andre hadn't posted the code, someone eventually would had. It's not > unfortunate he did that at all; but rather quite fortunate that he did. > Because now it brings it out to the public. Do you really think he was the > first one to notice this?
Numerous sci type tv shows have used a phrase similar to: "Things have a way of being discovered when it's their time."
When it's time for people's knowledge and beliefs to evolve, a 'discovery' can pop up several times around the world without collaboration.
That said however, it's also wise to quietly incorporate the patch and let it get spread into the wild before raising a ruckus about it. Now we have a big blathering thread about it, archived in thousands of places around the web for all history and we don't yet have a patched kernel.
When the most recent kernel root level compromise bug hit, it was kept quiet for almost a month so distros could be updated and it could start spreading. Once all the sub-structure was updated, the announcement was made. Everyone was ready for the clamor and slam on ftp servers and more people were immediately protected.
As it stands now, we're all baring our weakspots and advertising it before the patch is made. Let's stop and think about it in -this- light for a moment.
-d
-- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
begin:vcard n:Ford;David x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg"> adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:david@kalifornia.com title:Blue Labs Developer x-mozilla-cpt:;-12480 fn:David Ford end:vcard
| |