Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:52:23 -0800 (PST) | From | Chris Mason <> | Subject | Re: patch: reiserfs for 2.3.49 |
| |
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
[ Hans: block preallocation or allocate on flush would be faster ] > > Does on-disk layout differ between no-prealloc, prealloc, and > alloc-on-flush versions? Probably not.
Correct. The only thing that changes is when we grab free blocks. The disk format is the same regardless.
> Then there's no problem getting > no-prealloc into kernel first ASAP, then changing it to > alloc-on-flush.
Yes.
-chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |