Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Mar 2000 16:09:25 -0800 (PST) | From | Chris Mason <> | Subject | Re: (reiserfs) Re: patch: reiserfs for 2.3.49 |
| |
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > We don't yet have a set of valid benchmarks. I can generally say that I don't > > have confidence in the benchmark performance of this code, there are too many > > tweaks not yet done, and our goal for Monday is a port to 2.3.51 that does not > > crash. I hope Linus will put this port in as an experimental filesystem, and > > then a bit later we'll be able to tell him the performance merits making it a > > more than experimental use FS. > > Ahem. I really hate to say it, but I dearly hope that it will not happen > right now. IMNSHO reiserfs in the official tree right now is the worst > thing one can do to VFS. If my opinion on that is of any interest - > please, don't do it. > Al >
Ok, Is it the 64 bits of information needed to find a an object in reiserfs, or is there something else? We are more than open to criticism and direction, privately or to the list.
-chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |