lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: > 15,000 Simultaneous Connections
Date
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Nordwick <nordwick@erdos.askjeeves.com> writes:
> I/O you just want to wait for anything to come in, but for thread termination
> you may either want to wait for a single thread to terminate or all of
> the threads you are interested to terminate. This added complexity is

Of course, not. This kind of design leads to madness (so I assume that it's
the win32 approach and that's why you hate it):
You just want to wait for a single thread to terminate.
The `wait for all threads' case can easily be reproduced on top of it.
KISS.


Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.023 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site