Messages in this thread | | | From | "Jones D (ISaCS)" <> | Subject | RE: Cosmetic bugs? (msg irrellevant) | Date | Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:20:41 +0100 |
| |
> > Trapping all these cases to panic and > > explain why would probably be not worth the space that they > would take up,
> Please note that these two functions are __init functions, I think in > these your reason doesn't apply
True, but I was speaking as a general case as in most of the list that I pointed out..
> > as they really are 99.9% impossible to hit. (Or at least should be). > Sorry my poor english, do you want to mean "impossible to > recover from"?
No, I meant that the code really should "never fail" (famous last words?)
regards,
Dave.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |