lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: Cosmetic bugs? (msg irrellevant)
Date
> > Trapping all these cases to panic and
> > explain why would probably be not worth the space that they
> would take up,

> Please note that these two functions are __init functions, I think in
> these your reason doesn't apply

True, but I was speaking as a general case as in most of the list that I
pointed out..

> > as they really are 99.9% impossible to hit. (Or at least should be).
> Sorry my poor english, do you want to mean "impossible to
> recover from"?

No, I meant that the code really should "never fail" (famous last words?)

regards,

Dave.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.081 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site