Messages in this thread | | | From | Mogens Dybaek Christensen <> | Subject | Re: SCHE_RR/FIFO | Date | Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:34:08 GMT |
| |
Could the problem described in this thread be the same as the problem with a nonosleep() loop under SCHED_FIFO I described in another posting titled "Loop with nanosleep() (almost) monopolizes CPU"?
In article <7n3t5q$lkk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, mourot@my-deja.com wrote: > But It still remains a PB. The SCHED_RR pre-emption is based on 1s time > slice ( which seems to be a bug ). > This prevents a Soft Real time process from using such a scheduling. > > Any thoughts ? >
-- Mogens Dybaek Christensen, mailto:mdc@dksin.dk Adtranz Signal A/S, Denmark
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |