Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Aug 1999 17:16:22 +0200 | From | Paul Slootman <> | Subject | Re: no driver change for 2.4? |
| |
On Mon 09 Aug 1999, Christer Weinigel wrote: > > One thing I would like to see though is a stable and an unstable > version of the ISDN code. Right now there is just one tree for the > 2.2 kernels, I'd like to see one tree which only gets bugfixes, no new
This is one of the things that was talked about (and agreed upon) at the last developers' meeting. First priority was to make one version that would work on all the kernel versions (to prevent the different trees getting out of sync). That's been done now; the next step is getting the current state into the kernel :-) Once that's been done, I'm guessing the "stable" and "unstable" trees will be created (when Fritz Elfert gets the time...).
> features. Since I have access to some equipment to perform the TBR3 > certifications I could volunteer to check that the any changes won't > break the conformance tests. I don't know if that's enough to keep > the telecos happy but it probably would not be a bad thing to do.
I think that would be great. I hope Karsten Keil will have time soon to respond to you himself; he's the one which which such things should be coordinated IMHO.
Paul Slootman -- home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/ debian: paul@debian.org isdn4linux: paul@isdn4linux.de work: paul@murphy.nl Murphy Software, Enschede, NL
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |