lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Help figuring out NFS patches
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, W. Reilly Cooley wrote:

No, it doesn't. There are also messages such as

kernel: nfsd_create: dentry .dt/tmp not negative!

> > So here I am:
> >
> > Stock 2.2.10 kernel
> > knfsd-1.4.6 binary RPM from H.J. Lu
> >
> > linux-2.2.7-sunrpc.patch
> > nfsd-2.2.7-2.lockd.patch
> > nfsd-2.2.7-3.patch
> > nfsd-2.2.7-nfsfh.patch
> > locks-2.2.3.diff
> >
> > Can someone hit me with a clue bat about exactly which of these patches I
> > should apply?
>

i have linux-2.2.11pre1 running with all the above patches applied,
except for lock-2.2.3.diff. And it's been working fine for a couple
of linux clients and an OpenStep/Mach client.

Without those patches i had a lot problems with locking, file stats
not updated properly, etc.. with: everything works swimmingly.

i havn't stress tested it though. But the clients so far have
survived server reboots without a problem.

PS: the nfsd-2.2.7-2.lockd.patch needs to be applied with -p2.. and i
added an extra 'exportfs -r' to /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs /after/ starting
nfsd. otherwise it didn't sync up properly for some reason.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma
paul@clubi.ie http://hibernia.clubi.ie
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
Thrashing is just virtual crashing.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.020 / U:25.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site