lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: OOM
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Bernd Paysan wrote:

: I think Rik's algorithm is good enough and has the enormous advantage of
: being cost-free in normal operation (*and* it has been tested). I'll take
: his weighting algorithm (size/(sqrt(cpu_time)*sqrt(sqrt(run_time)))), but
: add my warning shot, and convert it to a more recent kernel (2.3.10). Too
: bad that we don't have a free signal for SIGMEM at hand ;-).

Yes, too bad ;) Feel free to substitute something better for Rik's
algorithm if it comes along. Just so far I haven't seen anything.

I'm just very egocentrically looking at things and commenting at anything
that could affect my situation.

Claus

--
claus.fischer@intel.com Intel Corporation SC12-205 ... not speaking
phone +1-408-765-6808 2200 Mission College Blvd. for Intel
fax +1-408-765-9322 Santa Clara, CA 95052-8119


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.036 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site