lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: kernel thread support - LWP's
Date

Richard wrote:
>This is why I said that if we can't cleanly support POSIX semantics,
>we should try and get POSIX changed. But first we should let people
>coding patches show whether or not they can provide a clean
>implementation of POSIX semantics.

I don't see why these should be done in series rather than in parallel ...
let's have 2 threads (or is that processes?), one for each job :-)

cheers

andrew
(who recalls working on a huge singlethreaded event-driven system running a
phone system)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.021 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site