Messages in this thread | | | From | "Andrew Dunstan" <> | Subject | Re: kernel thread support - LWP's | Date | Thu, 15 Jul 1999 22:54:08 -0400 |
| |
Richard wrote: >This is why I said that if we can't cleanly support POSIX semantics, >we should try and get POSIX changed. But first we should let people >coding patches show whether or not they can provide a clean >implementation of POSIX semantics.
I don't see why these should be done in series rather than in parallel ... let's have 2 threads (or is that processes?), one for each job :-)
cheers
andrew (who recalls working on a huge singlethreaded event-driven system running a phone system)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |