Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Jul 1999 04:14:29 +0200 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: kernel thread support - LWP's |
| |
Larry McVoy wrote: > : Looks like an argument for another kind of process group, rather than > : eliminating process ids for individual threads. > > But it will do exactly what you want without you doing a thing. When the > shell creates a piple line like that, _all_ of the processes are placed > in the same process group - that's how it's always worked. If each of > those processes then cloned themselves, they would still all be in the > same process group.
That's the problem: ^C does the right thing but SIGIO does not. It needs a different kind of group to have SIGIO and ^C working at the same time -- if we want the at all.
-- Jamie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |