lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kernel thread support - LWP's
Larry McVoy wrote:
> : Looks like an argument for another kind of process group, rather than
> : eliminating process ids for individual threads.
>
> But it will do exactly what you want without you doing a thing. When the
> shell creates a piple line like that, _all_ of the processes are placed
> in the same process group - that's how it's always worked. If each of
> those processes then cloned themselves, they would still all be in the
> same process group.

That's the problem: ^C does the right thing but SIGIO does not. It
needs a different kind of group to have SIGIO and ^C working at the same
time -- if we want the at all.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.038 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site