lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: The stability crisis
From
Date
>> "AL" == Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com> writes:

AL> I think one of the kernel developers (Alan Cox?) rejected
AL> bugzilla for the kernel. Is a bug database going to be
AL> integrated into BitKeeper?

Why not just use GNATS and CVS, which are available now? They seem
adequate for *BSD. B.t.w. using FBSD -current as well, I must say that
somehow they do manage to have the development branch (4.0) with lots
of innovation going on stay rock solid, let alone the official -stable
branch (which gets lots of backports of fixes and safe improvements
from -current).

I really like Linux features, good hardware support etc but I think it
is such a pity it doesn't try to borrow a bit more from the good
things of other free projects.

--
Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know
plm@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands | what I'm doing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.045 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site