Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: The stability crisis | From | Peter Mutsaers <> | Date | 01 Jul 1999 21:24:46 +0200 |
| |
>> "AL" == Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com> writes:
AL> I think one of the kernel developers (Alan Cox?) rejected AL> bugzilla for the kernel. Is a bug database going to be AL> integrated into BitKeeper?
Why not just use GNATS and CVS, which are available now? They seem adequate for *BSD. B.t.w. using FBSD -current as well, I must say that somehow they do manage to have the development branch (4.0) with lots of innovation going on stay rock solid, let alone the official -stable branch (which gets lots of backports of fixes and safe improvements from -current).
I really like Linux features, good hardware support etc but I think it is such a pity it doesn't try to borrow a bit more from the good things of other free projects.
-- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know plm@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands | what I'm doing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |