lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: TCP/PPP bug 2.3.5?
On Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Nate Riffe wrote:
....
> filled to capacity and stays there until the transfer is complete. I
> think this is a network stack problem and not a hardware problem because
> ping -f gets 0% packet loss (one run lost 10 packets out of 60,000). This
> only happens with bulk transfer, interactive sessions are perfectly fine.

"ping -f" uses small frames, try using LARGE frames like
bulk TCP datastream does.

ping -f -s 1480 dest.host

what happens ?

Very likely you have hardware problems at the cabeling,
or at the network switch.

> -Nate
> Nate Riffe Duct tape by any other name is just as
> inkblot@geocities.com sticky.

/Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.069 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site