lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: networking problem with 2.0.36 and 2.2.10
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Mike Keehan wrote:

>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Try a more up to date version of PCMCIA.
>

OK, I am running pcmcia-cs-3.0.13 now and the problem persits :-(
I would really appreciate your help since all my logs are getting filled
in quite a short time. And directing everything to console is probably not
the way it should be ...

_____________________________________________________________
> On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 10:44:00AM +0000, Thomas Speck wrote:
> >
> > Hi !
> > I am using a PLANET PCMCIA Ethernetcard of the type ENW-3502 in my laptop
> > which is supposed to be NE2000 compatible. Using pcmcia-cs-3.0.9 with
> > options for pcnet_cs as io=0x300 and irq=3 I obtain the following logs:

I add here the logs I got for 3.0.13 just to be sure ...

Jun 28 14:24:57 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs
69.
Jun 28 14:24:58 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x55
size=96
Jun 28 14:24:58 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt,
lasttx=20.
Jun 28 14:25:01 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs
62.
Jun 28 14:25:03 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs
69.
Jun 28 14:25:15 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs
5d.
Jun 28 14:25:17 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs
73.
Jun 28 14:25:20 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs
67.
Jun 28 14:27:21 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x5b
size=114
Jun 28 14:28:23 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x5f
size=247
Jun 28 14:29:23 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x7c
size=259
Jun 28 14:30:28 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 2 vs
62.
Jun 28 14:40:53 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x7b
size=114
Jun 28 14:42:59 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 2 vs
74.

> > I get this with kernel-2.0.36 as well as with 2.2.10. I don't believe this
> > is a problem with cable since I can reproduce it with either BNC or RJ45
> > connections.
> > Do you have any suggestions about this ?
> >
> > If you need more information or let me do some tests, just let me know.
> >
> > Thank you
> > --
> > Thomas


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.183 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site