Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:52:31 +0000 ( ) | From | Thomas Speck <> | Subject | Re: networking problem with 2.0.36 and 2.2.10 |
| |
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Mike Keehan wrote:
> > Hi Thomas, > > Try a more up to date version of PCMCIA. >
OK, I am running pcmcia-cs-3.0.13 now and the problem persits :-( I would really appreciate your help since all my logs are getting filled in quite a short time. And directing everything to console is probably not the way it should be ...
_____________________________________________________________ > On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 10:44:00AM +0000, Thomas Speck wrote: > > > > Hi ! > > I am using a PLANET PCMCIA Ethernetcard of the type ENW-3502 in my laptop > > which is supposed to be NE2000 compatible. Using pcmcia-cs-3.0.9 with > > options for pcnet_cs as io=0x300 and irq=3 I obtain the following logs:
I add here the logs I got for 3.0.13 just to be sure ...
Jun 28 14:24:57 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs 69. Jun 28 14:24:58 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x55 size=96 Jun 28 14:24:58 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20. Jun 28 14:25:01 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs 62. Jun 28 14:25:03 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs 69. Jun 28 14:25:15 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs 5d. Jun 28 14:25:17 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs 73. Jun 28 14:25:20 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 1 vs 67. Jun 28 14:27:21 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x5b size=114 Jun 28 14:28:23 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x5f size=247 Jun 28 14:29:23 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x7c size=259 Jun 28 14:30:28 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 2 vs 62. Jun 28 14:40:53 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x7b size=114 Jun 28 14:42:59 PC-ThS kernel: eth0: mismatched read page pointers 2 vs 74.
> > I get this with kernel-2.0.36 as well as with 2.2.10. I don't believe this > > is a problem with cable since I can reproduce it with either BNC or RJ45 > > connections. > > Do you have any suggestions about this ? > > > > If you need more information or let me do some tests, just let me know. > > > > Thank you > > -- > > Thomas
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |