Messages in this thread | | | From | (Miquel van Smoorenburg) | Subject | Re: version.h in 2.2.10 | Date | 21 Jun 1999 11:01:52 +0200 |
| |
In article <cistron.376DDB32.33C46DD4@unt.edu>, Matthew Vanecek <mev0003@unt.edu> wrote: >I generally cut out all the flak, usually w/make mrproper, in between >kernel compiles. I had *thought* the only thing I needed to do was to >restore the asm link. If people are going to be compiling stuff against >Linux header files, perhaps we should consider actually *leaving* them >in there when the kernel tree is cleaned (e.g., with mrproper), and for >a really pristine tree, move those deletions to distclean or something >similar. > >Of course, once you actually *know* about these things, it's a small >matter to fix it. But going through the failed compiles, wondering what >the heck happened to your kernel tree, sure is irritating.
Yet another reason _not_ to make /usr/include/{linux,asm} symlinks to the kernel tree. Some distributions just include known-good kernel headers in the libc6 development package. I haven't had the above problem for years.
Mike.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |