Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about | Date | Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:57:16 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > > Apache 2.0 should be. > > "Should" isn't good enough, it will be nice to know, what kind of design > will cause the performance to be increased so dramatically. So far all
The phhttpd design for one.
> > > BTW: the big issue with khttpd is a lack of genericness. Its a > > > single problem single solution piece of code. There are lots and > > Any examples? All other protocols except NFS (that is already in kernel)
ftp, even finger, mp3 streaming. It also should scale better than a khttpd would because it removes the killer thread/request problem.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |