lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers)
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> What gets me is there are people saying khttpd is a good idea, when its
> reporting lower performance than a user space httpd and who are anti-devfs

I find khttpd is a reasonable idea. I dont know what youre talking about
with "lower performance than a user space httpd",
http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/ seems to indicate otherwise -- what
performance measurements were you looking at? B)

Remember that the current khttpd is basically proof of concept and
actually approaches zeus performance wise -- and they werent even trying
very hard!

Now if you plug khttpd in front of apache the advantages become obvious.
Apache isnt exactly a speed demon -- but with khttpd it could be.

We want to kick M$' ass as much as possible in the performance arena.
khttpd is one way to do it.

-Dan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.069 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site