Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:58:16 +0100 | From | Steve Dodd <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs) |
| |
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > BTW: the big issue with khttpd is a lack of genericness. Its a single > > problem single solution piece of code. There are lots and lots of > > equivalent problems and they all boil own to the same thing. > > Not that I completely disagree with you, but I'm just > curious if you think the same way about knfsd...
I think the difference is that knfsd addresses some 'correctness' issues as well as performance ones. Though I may well have misunderstood.
-- 20962296
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |