Messages in this thread | | | From | (david parsons) | Subject | Re: Patch 2.2.10 is wrong | Date | 14 Jun 1999 17:21:02 -0700 |
| |
In article <linux.kernel.Pine.LNX.4.10.9906141325010.807-100000@cyrix200.lameter.com>, Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com> wrote: >Keeping linux up to date does not only mean the kernel but also the tools >etc. The only distro allowing this is the unstable debian distribution. I >am running daily upgrades of the distro with the super apt tool. Get out >of the stoneage not only with the kernel but also with the corresponding >tools. It really is possible and I have done it that way for a long time. > >patch has been changed a long time ago by the way.
OpenBSD, as of last fall, used patch 2.0.
If patch 2.5 isn't compatable with a version of patch with the same major number that's less than two years old, patch 2.5 is broken.
____ david parsons \bi/ patch 1.0 is prehistoric. patch 2.0 is up-to-date. \/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |