Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:05:21 +0200 (CEST) | From | "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <> | Subject | Re: subtle bug in <include/asm-i386/unistd.h> |
| |
On 31-Mar-99 Philip Blundell wrote: >>While extending our UPX executable packer to support Linux/i386 >>executables I've stumbled over what I think is a subtle bug in >>the `asm volatile' statements. > > What do you think the problem is? As far as I can tell your patch should > have > no effect. You've just expressed the same thing slightly differently. > > Can you provide a test case and an example of it going wrong?
See the program below. Sorry for consuming bandwidth.
Markus
----- Markus Oberhumer <markus.oberhumer@jk.uni-linz.ac.at> ----- ----- http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/ ----- ----- 5E CB 5C 85 DE AF 9E BF E9 DA 7E 6A 39 F8 CC 67 -----
3 WARPS TO URANUS
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream] | |