lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: subtle bug in <include/asm-i386/unistd.h>
On 31-Mar-99 Philip Blundell wrote:
>>While extending our UPX executable packer to support Linux/i386
>>executables I've stumbled over what I think is a subtle bug in
>>the `asm volatile' statements.
>
> What do you think the problem is? As far as I can tell your patch should
> have
> no effect. You've just expressed the same thing slightly differently.
>
> Can you provide a test case and an example of it going wrong?

See the program below. Sorry for consuming bandwidth.

Markus

----- Markus Oberhumer <markus.oberhumer@jk.uni-linz.ac.at> -----
----- http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/ -----
----- 5E CB 5C 85 DE AF 9E BF E9 DA 7E 6A 39 F8 CC 67 -----

3 WARPS TO URANUS


[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.055 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site