Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: subtle bug in <include/asm-i386/unistd.h> | Date | Wed, 31 Mar 1999 13:05:41 +0100 | From | Philip Blundell <> |
| |
>While extending our UPX executable packer to support Linux/i386 >executables I've stumbled over what I think is a subtle bug in >the `asm volatile' statements.
What do you think the problem is? As far as I can tell your patch should have no effect. You've just expressed the same thing slightly differently.
Can you provide a test case and an example of it going wrong?
p.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |