Messages in this thread | | | From | "Prashant TR" <> | Subject | Re: Possible workaround for buggy E801 call in 2.2.x | Date | Tue, 21 Dec 1999 08:13:16 +0530 |
| |
david parsons wrote:
> If you're assuming that E801 is only broken when AX > 15mb, you'll get bitten when your 12mb machine cheerfully > E801's back 14.5mb in AX
But I did mention that we would be using the standard call in that case. Currently there is nothing that can detect the memory size perfectly. E801 _does_ fail on many systems. The question now is whether there have been failures with E820. So, maybe E801 should be off by default. Most of the new software use E820, too.
> Are there any cases where a system does not have E820 but has a > broken E801? And in that case, is there any safe way to deal > with it?
I don't know of a system with E820 and a broken E801 at present.
Prashant ------------------------------------------ One pound of learning requires ten pounds of common sense to apply it.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place. Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |