Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 19 Dec 1999 00:13:00 +0100 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: RasterMan on linux and threads |
| |
raster@rasterman.com wrote: > > On 18 Dec, Ingo Molnar scribbled: > -> > -> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 raster@rasterman.com wrote: > -> > -> > On 17 Dec, Dan Kegel scribbled: > -> > -> re http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9912_03/msg00480.html > -> > -> > -> > -> Rasterman is wrong in saying that all threads run on the same > -> > > -> > hmm - when did that change ? [...] > -> > -> threads/processes ran on all CPUs concurrently ever since SMP Linux > -> existed. > > the preference weighting tries to kep themont he same cpu to some > extent - ut as allan poitned out - idle pu's will be preferred over > recyclign the came cpu - an that's exatly what i want... use up all he > cpu's u have - esecially if they're idle.
Thank's Lord! Finally someone out there with a spelling even worser then myself!!
-- Marcin Dalecki
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |