Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:44:33 -0500 (EST) | From | raster@rasterma ... | Subject | re: RasterMan on linux and threads |
| |
On 18 Dec, Ingo Molnar scribbled: -> -> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 raster@rasterman.com wrote: -> -> > On 17 Dec, Dan Kegel scribbled: -> > -> re http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9912_03/msg00480.html -> > -> -> > -> Rasterman is wrong in saying that all threads run on the same -> > -> > hmm - when did that change ? [...] -> -> threads/processes ran on all CPUs concurrently ever since SMP Linux -> existed.
the preference weighting tries to kep themont he same cpu to some extent - ut as allan poitned out - idle pu's will be preferred over recyclign the came cpu - an that's exatly what i want... use up all he cpu's u have - esecially if they're idle.
-- --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster@rasterman.com raster@valinux.com raster@enlightenment.org raster@linux.com raster@zip.com.au
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |