Messages in this thread | | | From | Shawn Leas <> | Subject | RE: jfs/linux | Date | Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:19:35 -0500 |
| |
And I should have mentioned, even if DTFS was usable right now, it doesn't de-allocate blocks, and is still in need of an fs cleaner.
Log strustured filesystems (as discussed previously on l-k) have performance issues due to the "append" rather than "modify in place" nature in which writes happen.
The benefit comes in things like snapshots, where you can preserve metadata at some point in time, basically having a readonly copy of the whole FS from time HH:SS.
They are interesting, though! I hope some people get interested and help out.
-Shawn
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen C. Tweedie [mailto:sct@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 6:17 AM To: Shawn Leas Cc: 'Josef Höök'; linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: RE: jfs/linux
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:59:34 -0500, Shawn Leas <SLEAS@videoupdate.com> said:
> There's also dtfs... Ted has a link to it from his homepage > under the Ext2 homepage...
Yes, but dtfs is not strictly the same thing -- it is log structured, not journaled. I also haven't seen any activity on it in months.
--Stephen
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |