lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: routing problems in 2.2.0-pre4

Thanks. Actually, I was able to remove the route, but it still appeared
in the routing table until I updated to net-tools 1.49, which was
confusing.. I hadn't updated because the changes.html page on linuxhq said
it was only needed for IPv6, which I wasn't using...

With the new net-tools, it looks better, and ifconfig no longer shows all
the packets as errors either, so it appears that the problem is mostly a
documentation thing. I should notify the linuxhq maintainer that net-tools
is a required update even for IPv4...


On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Matt Kemner wrote:
> The way you have set up your subnets is not the usual way of going about
> it, which is why the computer gets it "wrong"

I don't mind that it gets it wrong... It was wrong in 2.0.36 too, but I
was unable to fix it. So, I was getting visions of NT - setting up things
wrong and then not allowing it to be fixed :-).

> Of course a much better way would be to do:
...
> and change the interface on the router you're connected to,
...
> But I'm sure you have a valid reason for needing the network the way it
> is.

Yep, the reason is that I don't have control over the router... It's my
ISP's property. Plus, they probably would not want to waste 2 addresses
per customer (net and broadcast) to do it that way.


thanks,
Val Gough


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.133 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site