Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Jan 1999 01:33:17 +0100 (MET) | From | David Weinehall <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.0-pre1-ac4: unresolved symbol unix98_max_ptys |
| |
On 4 Jan 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <368F7DCC.697F5344@student.anu.edu.au> > By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <v3100411@student.anu.edu.au> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel [snip]
> 1. Don't compile Unix98 as a module (although it should work, it is a > highly discouraged configuration -- the modular option is mainly for > testing, as the modularity overhead is significant.)
Then, would it be possible to mark only the modular code [experimental] with some kind of configure/menuconfig/xconfig hack?! That is, if you enable [experimental], it'd show < >, else [ ].... /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |