Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.0-pre1-ac4: unresolved symbol unix98_max_ptys | Date | Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:34:31 -0800 (PST) |
| |
> On 4 Jan 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > Followup to: <368F7DCC.697F5344@student.anu.edu.au> > > By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <v3100411@student.anu.edu.au> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > [snip] > > > 1. Don't compile Unix98 as a module (although it should work, it is a > > highly discouraged configuration -- the modular option is mainly for > > testing, as the modularity overhead is significant.) > > Then, would it be possible to mark only the modular code [experimental] > with some kind of configure/menuconfig/xconfig hack?! That is, if you > enable [experimental], it'd show < >, else [ ].... > > /David Weinehall
I don't know if the systems would do the right thing if there was an if statement saying either tristate or bool; perhaps worth a shot...
-hpa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |