lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.0-pre1-ac4: unresolved symbol unix98_max_ptys
Date
> On 4 Jan 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Followup to: <368F7DCC.697F5344@student.anu.edu.au>
> > By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <v3100411@student.anu.edu.au>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> [snip]
>
> > 1. Don't compile Unix98 as a module (although it should work, it is a
> > highly discouraged configuration -- the modular option is mainly for
> > testing, as the modularity overhead is significant.)
>
> Then, would it be possible to mark only the modular code [experimental]
> with some kind of configure/menuconfig/xconfig hack?! That is, if you
> enable [experimental], it'd show < >, else [ ]....
>
> /David Weinehall

I don't know if the systems would do the right thing if there was an
if statement saying either tristate or bool; perhaps worth a shot...

-hpa


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.064 / U:1.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site