Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 15 Jan 1999 20:56:41 -0500 (EST) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: *** next draft - press release *** |
| |
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.990115195556.17518B-100000@z.ml.org>, Gregory > Maxwell > writes: > +----- > | > Correct. A 486SX doesn't have much in common with a '486. I should > | > have remembered that these nickel chips are still sprinkled around > | > here and there pretending to be the real thing. > | > | Actually, at least some of the 486SX cpus had the same dies as the DX cpus > | and just had a single line not connected externally. > +--->8 > > Weren't the original 486SX'es just recycled early-stepping 486DX'es that had > FPU bugs?
I think so.
Cheers, Dick Johnson ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** Penguin : Linux version 2.1.131 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips). Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology. Wisdom : It's not a Y2K problem. It's a Y2Day problem.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |