Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: *** next draft - press release *** | Date | Fri, 15 Jan 1999 20:17:16 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.990115195556.17518B-100000@z.ml.org>, Gregory Maxwell writes: +----- | > Correct. A 486SX doesn't have much in common with a '486. I should | > have remembered that these nickel chips are still sprinkled around | > here and there pretending to be the real thing. | | Actually, at least some of the 486SX cpus had the same dies as the DX cpus | and just had a single line not connected externally. +--->8
Weren't the original 486SX'es just recycled early-stepping 486DX'es that had FPU bugs?
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |