Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Apr 1996 00:18:38 -0500 (CDT) | From | Doug Ledford <> | Subject | RE: 1.2.13 and patches |
| |
One more thing I thought of. I know that most of the people on this list use 1.3.xx, and therefore have little need for this patch. However, a lot of the people in the news groups do. This brings me to a sticky issue with this patch. Although this isn't an official 1.2.14, the makefile does declare the code to be so. The reason is that the include/linux/version.h generating code was broken if I used something like 1.2.13-patched or 1.2.14-unofficial in the main Makefile. For that reason, I don't want to advertise this patch anywhere but here on this list unless the powers that be approve it going out with that version number (it really is sooooo heavily patched that I think anyone would have a hard time calling it 1.2.13). I would appreciate those "powers that be" letting me know what they want me to do on this issue. Should I let it out beyond this list, or keep it here?
***************************************************************************** * Doug Ledford * Unix, Novell, Dos, Windows 3.x, * * dledford@dialnet.net 873-DIAL * WfW, Windows 95 & NT Technician * * PPP access $14.95/month ***************************************** * Springfield, MO and surrounding * Usenet news, e-mail and shell account.* * communities. Sign-up online at * Web page creation and hosting, other * * 873-9000 V.34 * services available, call for info. * *****************************************************************************
| |