lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Some Serious 1.3.90 Issues, Again.
Date
From
> In article <199604190128.VAA08250@nic.ott.hookup.net> you write:
> >Why do people expect consistency with _EXPERIMENTAL_ kernels?
>
> That's the stupidest answer I've seen on the kernel list in quite a while.

A flame is uncalled for.

> We're in a code freeze. Things SHOULD be working perfectly.

I disagree. Code freeze = no new features are being added,
the current ones are being polished with the intent to release
a production version. Or so I understand it.

Feel free to correct me, without flaming, if I'm wrong on this.

-- Andrew E. Mileski --
mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net
http://www.redhat.com/~aem/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.019 / U:1.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site