Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Some Serious 1.3.90 Issues, Again. | Date | Fri, 19 Apr 1996 15:52:46 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Andrew E. Mileski" <> |
| |
> In article <199604190128.VAA08250@nic.ott.hookup.net> you write: > >Why do people expect consistency with _EXPERIMENTAL_ kernels? > > That's the stupidest answer I've seen on the kernel list in quite a while.
A flame is uncalled for.
> We're in a code freeze. Things SHOULD be working perfectly.
I disagree. Code freeze = no new features are being added, the current ones are being polished with the intent to release a production version. Or so I understand it.
Feel free to correct me, without flaming, if I'm wrong on this.
-- Andrew E. Mileski -- mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net http://www.redhat.com/~aem/
| |