Messages in this thread | | | From | "Paul Flinders" <> | Subject | Re: smbfs vs nfs | Date | Mon, 2 Dec 1996 13:28:25 -0000 |
| |
> From: steve farrell <sfarrell@healthquiz.com> > has anyone tried using smbfs in place of nfs and done a performance > comparison? any thoughts on this being a usable possibility?
The main problem would probably be that smbfs doesn't support Unix permissions or symbolic links.
| |