lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Linux kernel file name

On 10 Dec 96 at 13:33, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:

> > > 1. There is an exported list of symbols, that are needed to allow linking
> > > in the modules: /proc/ksyms.
> > > This is not the complete symbol table.
> >
> > This makes that feature rather useless IMHO.
>
> Agreed, but then it was not supposed to be a System.map file equivalent
> that is HARDCODED (ie. excess baggage) in the kernel.
>
> > Wouldn't it be good if there were a way to check if the System.map
> > really matches the active kernel. What if we add the "kernel version
> > stamp" as text to the System.map and then use the address from the
> > System.mao where that value should be. If finally the value in the
> > kernel is the one from System.map, the kernel finally must be
> > compatible. (I don't know what syslogd does to obtain its result
> > "System.map matches kernel", but it is not always correct).
>
> The kernel version stamp is already in System.map
> It has a silly name...something like "Version" :-)
> It uses one byte to version part. Example: v2.1.14 = 0x0002010e

No, I meant the _full_ version string, the one with the "build
number" (#12) and "build date". Sometimes you have different
configurations of the same release bootable...

Ulrich

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.082 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site