lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] time/tick-sched: idle load balancing when nohz_full cpu becomes idle.
Hi Markus.

> * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration?

> * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs
better into account?

Sorry for my mistake, I've fixed it but, I sent an old one :(

Thanks

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:38 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
>
> > When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(),
> > It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't
> …
> > So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped
> > check.
>
> * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration?
>
> * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs
> better into account?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc7#n94
>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++--
>
> Will further patch version descriptions become helpful behind the marker line?
>
> Regards,
> Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-08 21:15    [W:0.070 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site