Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 May 2024 20:38:56 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] time/tick-sched: idle load balancing when nohz_full cpu becomes idle. | From | Markus Elfring <> |
| |
> When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(), > It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't … > So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped > check.
* Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration?
* Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs better into account? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc7#n94
> --- > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++--
Will further patch version descriptions become helpful behind the marker line?
Regards, Markus
| |