Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:51:31 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3) |
| |
* Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> What was the destiny of that patch? I haven't seen it accepted, > haven't seen any comments... while this is not a mere warning fix. > What am I expected to do to get it accepted -- recast it against > 2.6.19-rt1?
i'd suggest to redo it - but please keep it simple and clean. Those dozens of casts to u64 are quite ugly. Why is cycles_t 32-bits on some of the arches to begin with?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |