Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:33:54 +0300 | From | Sergei Shtylyov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3) |
| |
Hello, I wrote:
> In addition to the clock jump-back check being falsely triggered by clock wrap > with 32-bit cycles_t, as noticed by Kevin Hilman, there's another issue: using > %Lx format to print 32-bit values warrants erroneous values on 32-bit machines > like ARM and PPC32...
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
What was the destiny of that patch? I haven't seen it accepted, haven't seen any comments... while this is not a mere warning fix. What am I expected to do to get it accepted -- recast it against 2.6.19-rt1?
> kernel/latency_trace.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
WBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |