lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3)
Hello, I wrote:

> In addition to the clock jump-back check being falsely triggered by clock wrap
> with 32-bit cycles_t, as noticed by Kevin Hilman, there's another issue: using
> %Lx format to print 32-bit values warrants erroneous values on 32-bit machines
> like ARM and PPC32...

> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

What was the destiny of that patch? I haven't seen it accepted, haven't
seen any comments... while this is not a mere warning fix. What am I expected
to do to get it accepted -- recast it against 2.6.19-rt1?

> kernel/latency_trace.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-03 20:35    [W:0.484 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site