lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 0/5] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fine-tuning and 'no stable backport' tag
Date
After a recent discussion regarding "do we need a 'nobackport' tag" I
set out to create one change for stable-kernel-rules.rst. This is now
the last patch in the series, which links to that discussion with
all the details; the other stuff is fine-tuning that happened along the
way.

Ciao, Thorsten
---
v1->v2:
* Add reviewed-by tag from Greg to the first patch.
* Change the backport example in 2 as suggested by Greg.
* Improve description of patch 3 while also making the change remove a
level of indenting.
* Add patch explaining stable@kernel.org (w/o @vger.)
* Move the patch adding a 'make AUTOSEL et. al. ignore a change' flag to
the end of the series and use stable+noautosel@kernel.org as
suggested my Konstantin and ACKed by Greg.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1712812895.git.linux@leemhuis.info/

Thorsten Leemhuis (5):
docs: stable-kernel-rules: reduce redundancy
docs: stable-kernel-rules: call mainline by its name and change
example
docs: stable-kernel-rules: remove code-labels tags and a indention
level
docs: stable-kernel-rules: explain use of stable@kernel.org (w/o
@vger.)
docs: stable-kernel-rules: create special tag to flag 'no backporting'

Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 234 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)


base-commit: 5eb4573ea63d0c83bf58fb7c243fc2c2b6966c02
--
2.44.0


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-29 09:19    [W:0.168 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site